March 23, 2026

E-E-A-T Checklist: A Practical Guide to Improving Your Site

A step-by-step E-E-A-T checklist covering Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. Learn what Google looks for and how to audit your site against these quality signals.

Mehmet Kose
Mehmet Kose
12 mins read

What Is E-E-A-T and Why Should You Care?

E-E-A-T stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. It comes from Google’s Search Quality Rater Guidelines, a document thousands of human evaluators use to assess search result quality. While not a direct ranking factor, E-E-A-T reflects the qualities Google’s systems are designed to reward.

If your site demonstrates strong E-E-A-T signals, your pages are more likely to earn strong rankings. If it doesn’t, even technically perfect SEO won’t save you from declining visibility - especially for topics where accuracy matters.

This guide breaks E-E-A-T into a concrete, auditable checklist. No vague advice. Each item is something you can verify, fix, or improve on your site today.

Understanding the Four Pillars

Before diving into the checklist, here’s what each letter actually means in practice.

Experience

Experience is the newest addition to the framework (the first E was added in December 2022). It asks whether the content creator has first-hand experience with the topic. A hotel review from someone who stayed there is more valuable than one assembled from marketing materials. A tutorial written by someone who actually built the thing carries more weight than one generated from documentation alone.

Experience signals are especially important for reviews, recommendations, how-to content, and any topic where personal involvement changes the quality of the advice.

Expertise

Expertise measures the creator’s knowledge or skill level. For YMYL topics (Your Money or Your Life) like medical advice, legal guidance, or financial planning, formal qualifications matter. A health article should be written or reviewed by a medical professional. A legal explainer needs someone with relevant credentials.

For non-YMYL topics, demonstrated knowledge is enough. A developer who has shipped production code can write authoritatively about programming patterns without a computer science degree.

Authoritativeness

Authoritativeness looks at reputation. Is this person or organization recognized as a go-to source on this topic? Authority grows through consistent publishing and citations from reputable sources. Industry recognition and a track record of accurate content reinforce it.

A cybersecurity blog that has been publishing in-depth research for years has authority. A generic site with one security article from last week lacks that standing.

Trustworthiness

Google considers trustworthiness the most important component of E-E-A-T. It encompasses accuracy, honesty, and reliability. A site can have experienced, authoritative content and still fail on trust. Broken links, HTTP pages, hidden ownership, or misleading information all undermine it.

Trust is the foundation everything else rests on.

The E-E-A-T Checklist

Experience Signals

  • Author bios include relevant experience - Each content creator’s bio should mention their direct experience with the topics they cover. “10 years building e-commerce platforms” is stronger than “content writer.”
  • Content reflects first-hand knowledge - Look for specific details, original observations, and practical insights that only come from direct involvement. Generic content signals a lack of experience.
  • Original images and media - Photos, screenshots, and videos from actual use or real-world scenarios demonstrate hands-on experience. Stock photos do not.
  • Case studies and real examples - Content referencing specific projects or scenarios the author completed strengthens the experience signal.
  • Dates and context - Mentioning when you used a product, visited a location, or completed a project adds credibility and helps readers assess relevance.

Expertise Signals

  • Author pages exist and are linked - Every content creator should have a dedicated author page with their background, credentials, and published work.
  • Credentials are visible - For YMYL topics, display relevant qualifications (degrees, certifications, professional memberships) on author pages and within article bios.
  • Content depth matches the topic - Expert content goes beyond surface-level coverage. It addresses edge cases, common mistakes, nuances, and practical implications.
  • Accurate, up-to-date information - Outdated statistics, deprecated advice, or factual errors undermine expertise. Audit content regularly and update or remove stale material.
  • Sources and references - Linking to primary sources, studies, and official documentation demonstrates research rigor and helps readers verify claims.
  • Structured, logical organization - Expert content is well-organized with clear headings, logical flow, and appropriate use of technical terminology without unnecessary jargon.

Authoritativeness Signals

  • About page with organizational identity - Your site needs a clear About page explaining who you are and why you’re qualified to publish on your topics.
  • Consistent topical focus - Sites that publish deep content within a defined subject area build authority faster than those that spread thin across many topics. Audit your content for topical coherence.
  • External recognition - Track mentions, citations, and backlinks from other authoritative sources. These are signals Google uses to assess your reputation.
  • Author presence beyond your site - Content creators who are active in their field (speaking at conferences, contributing to industry publications, maintaining professional profiles) strengthen your site’s authority.
  • Publishing history - A consistent track record of quality content over time builds authority. A blog that published 200 articles in one month then went silent lacks that credibility.
  • Structured data for organization and authors - Implement Organization and Person schema markup to help search engines connect your content to your entity and your authors’ identities.

Trustworthiness Signals

  • HTTPS everywhere - Your entire site must be served over HTTPS. Mixed content (HTTP resources on HTTPS pages) also undermines trust.
  • Contact information is accessible - Users and search engines should be able to find a real way to contact you. A contact page with a form, email address, or physical address is essential.
  • Privacy policy and terms of service - These pages signal transparency and are expected on any legitimate website, especially those handling user data.
  • No deceptive practices - Avoid misleading headlines, hidden affiliate relationships, fake reviews, or content that promises one thing and delivers another.
  • Transparent editorial policies - If you publish content from multiple authors, explain your editorial standards, fact-checking process, and correction policy.
  • Clean technical foundation - Broken links, server errors, redirect chains, slow pages, and missing metadata all erode trust. These are signals that the site is not well-maintained.
  • Accurate structured data - Schema markup must match visible page content. Structured data that claims a 5-star rating for a product with no reviews is deceptive.
  • Secure user interactions - Forms, login pages, and checkout processes must use HTTPS and follow security best practices. Exposed user data destroys trust instantly.

YMYL: When E-E-A-T Matters Most

YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) topics are areas where low-quality content could cause real harm. Google applies stricter E-E-A-T evaluation to these categories:

  • Health and safety - Medical advice, drug information, mental health content
  • Financial advice - Investment guidance, tax information, insurance, loans
  • Legal information - Legal rights, immigration, contracts, regulatory compliance
  • News and current events - Reporting on politics, science, and public safety
  • Civic information - Voting, government services, public policy

If your site covers any YMYL topics, every item on the E-E-A-T checklist becomes critical rather than optional. A missing author bio on a cooking blog is a minor issue. The same gap on a medical advice page is a serious trust problem.

For YMYL content specifically:

  • Content is reviewed by qualified professionals - Medical content by doctors, legal content by lawyers, financial content by certified advisors
  • Reviewer credentials are displayed - “Reviewed by Dr. Jane Smith, MD” with a link to their profile
  • Sources are cited inline - Link to studies, official guidelines, and authoritative references within the content, not just in a bibliography
  • Content is regularly audited for accuracy - Set a review schedule. Outdated medical or financial advice can cause real harm
  • Disclaimers where appropriate - “This is not medical/financial/legal advice” where applicable, with guidance on seeking professional help

Technical Signals That Support E-E-A-T

Many E-E-A-T qualities have a technical component that can be measured and automated. Here’s where a technical SEO audit intersects with those signals:

Trust Through Technical Quality

A well-maintained site signals trustworthiness. The opposite holds too - a site riddled with broken links and redirect chains looks neglected. And neglected sites lose trust.

Technical IssueE-E-A-T Impact
Broken internal linksErodes trust, signals poor maintenance
Redirect chainsSlows page delivery, wastes crawl budget
Missing meta descriptionsReduces perceived quality in search results
Missing H1 tagsWeakens content structure signals
Thin content pagesUndermines expertise perception
Slow response timesDamages user trust and engagement
HTTP pages (no HTTPS)Direct trust failure
Duplicate titles/descriptionsSignals low-effort, templated content

Structured Data for E-E-A-T

Structured data helps search engines verify and display your E-E-A-T signals:

  • Person schema for authors with jobTitle, affiliation, and sameAs links to professional profiles
  • Organization schema with name, url, logo, contactPoint, and sameAs links to official social accounts
  • Article schema with author, datePublished, dateModified, and publisher to establish content provenance
  • Review schema with author and reviewRating for transparent, attributed reviews
  • MedicalWebPage or FAQPage schema types where applicable to signal content type and purpose

Auditing Your Site for E-E-A-T

An E-E-A-T audit combines manual content review with automated technical checks. Here’s a practical workflow:

Step 1: Crawl Your Site

Start with a full crawl to get a technical baseline. This surfaces broken links, missing metadata, redirect issues, thin content, and other trust-eroding problems.

crawler crawl https://example.com --extract-content

The --extract-content flag pulls the main body of each page in Markdown format, which you’ll need for content quality assessment later.

Step 2: Run an SEO Audit

crawler seo example.com.crawl

This runs 23 automated checks that directly impact E-E-A-T signals. Review the results with an E-E-A-T lens:

  • Broken links and redirects - Trust issues. Fix immediately.
  • Missing or duplicate titles/descriptions - Quality perception issues. Prioritize high-traffic pages.
  • Thin or missing content - Expertise issues. Expand or consolidate.
  • Missing H1 tags - Structure issues. Add clear, descriptive headings.

Export the results for your team:

crawler seo example.com.crawl --export csv

Step 3: Manual Content Review

Technical checks catch the measurable signals, but E-E-A-T also requires human judgment. For each major content section on your site, ask:

  1. Who wrote this? Is the author identified? Do they have relevant experience or credentials?
  2. Is it accurate? When was it last updated? Are the facts current?
  3. Does it go deep enough? Would an expert in this field find this useful, or is it surface-level?
  4. Is it transparent? Are sources cited? Are affiliate relationships disclosed? Is the organization behind the site clearly identified?

Step 4: Prioritize and Fix

Not all E-E-A-T issues are equal. Prioritize based on:

  1. YMYL pages first - Any content that could impact health, finances, or safety gets top priority
  2. High-traffic pages - Fix trust issues on pages that get the most visibility
  3. Technical quick wins - Broken links, absent HTTPS, and missing metadata are fast fixes with outsized impact
  4. Content improvements - Author bios, source citations, and content depth take more effort but build lasting authority

Common E-E-A-T Mistakes

Fake expertise signals - Inventing credentials, using AI-generated author personas, or attributing content to people who didn’t write it. Google’s systems are increasingly capable of detecting this, and the penalty for getting caught is severe.

Ignoring technical trust - Spending time on author bios and About pages while your site is full of broken links and serves mixed HTTP/HTTPS content. Trust starts with the basics.

Treating E-E-A-T as a one-time project - These signals need ongoing maintenance. Content goes stale and links break. Team members leave and new pages ship without proper attribution. Build quality checks into your regular site maintenance workflow.

Confusing volume with authority - Publishing hundreds of thin articles on loosely related topics dilutes authority. A focused library of 50 deep, well-maintained articles builds more authority than 500 shallow ones.

Neglecting content freshness - Articles with outdated statistics, deprecated product references, or “Updated for 2023” headers signal neglect. Review and update published content on a regular schedule.

Building E-E-A-T Into Your Workflow

E-E-A-T isn’t a checklist you complete once and forget. It’s a set of principles that should inform how you create, publish, and maintain content. Here’s how to make it sustainable:

Before publishing:

  • Assign content to authors with relevant experience
  • Include author bios with credentials and experience
  • Cite sources for factual claims
  • Review YMYL content with qualified professionals

Monthly:

  • Run a full site crawl and SEO audit to catch technical trust issues
  • Review and fix broken links and redirect chains
  • Check that recently published content has proper author attribution and metadata

Quarterly:

  • Audit content for accuracy and freshness
  • Update or remove outdated material
  • Review author pages and organizational information
  • Assess topical coherence - are you staying focused on your area of expertise?

A regular technical audit with crawler.sh handles the automated portion of this workflow. Combine it with manual content review, and you have a complete E-E-A-T maintenance process.

curl -fsSL https://install.crawler.sh | sh

Wrap-up

A CMS shouldn't slow you down. Crawler aims to expand into your workflow — whether you're coding content models, collaborating on product copy, or launching updates at 2am.

If that sounds like the kind of tooling you want to use — try Crawler .

Crawler.sh - Free Local AEO & SEO Spider and a Markdown content extractor | Product Hunt